primroseburrows: (parliament hill)
primroseburrows ([personal profile] primroseburrows) wrote2008-06-03 02:04 pm

why yes, I am an idealist, thanks for asking.

So. At 3 p.m. today (in about twenty minutes), Parliament will be voting on whether to allow U.S. war resisters stay in Canada. I remember reading last year that their petition had been denied. I hadn't realised that the case was still open.

The thing is, even if the vote DOES pass, it might not mean anything, since the resolution is non-binding and the Harper government can ignore it. Which? They probably will.

My opinion doesn't matter a bit, but I'm definitely keeping my fingers crossed for these guys.


If you're interested in watching the vote live (or if you just like to watch politicians yelling at each other in two languages), go here at 3 PM EST (anytime after that you'll still get stuff, but it'll be other stuff). Don't everyone all rush at once. ;)

N.B.: I wholeheartedly support the troops in Iraq (and hope they come home ASAP), but I equally support those who make a conscientious choice not to fight in an illegal war.


ETA: Well, the vote passed, so now it's up to the government. *sigh*
ext_14817: (Flags)

[identity profile] meresy.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I suspect they're ignore it. But maybe they'll ignore the resisters, too.

[identity profile] irinaauthor.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Am I unsympathetic for reading this:

"I signed up to defend people and do humanitarian work," he said in pleading to be allowed to stay in Canada.

And thinking, "Oh, poor you?" I mean, he signed up. It's not like during Vietnam, when people were being drafted against their will. He knew that the National Guard can be deployed overseas, he signed up, he was going to be deployed overseas, and he ran away. Not much sympathy, there. I don't like the war any more than anyone else does, but jeez.