primroseburrows: (DT: come reap)
primroseburrows ([personal profile] primroseburrows) wrote2008-09-29 03:57 pm

[identity profile] peacey.livejournal.com 2008-09-29 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
True Republicans (not the free-spending Bush repubs) turned against a government-sponsored bailout of private industry. It was the principle that galled them (as it did me). Such intervention goes against the very fiber of what it is to be an economically conservative Republican; that is, small government, low tax, and as little intervention in a free market society as possible. Big government, and a more interposing ideology is more typically the world of the Democrat.
ext_3190: Red icon with logo "I drink Nozz-a-la- Cola" in cursive. (DT:and so it begins)

[identity profile] primroseburrows.livejournal.com 2008-09-29 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Such intervention goes against the very fiber of what it is to be an economically conservative Republican; that is, small government, low tax, and as little intervention in a free market society as possible

I don't hold to a lot of their views on a lot of things, but damn, I was PROUD of them. I might not agree with them, but they're holding to their principles and don't seem to be playing politics. Of course, I'm a big fat idealist and my view could be totally rose-coloured. It's interesting that a lot of people on the Left are against the bill, also. This whole clusterfuck goes way beyond party lines.