(no subject)
Jan. 31st, 2009 04:46 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
What she said.
I'd add something, but really, she says it all.
In other news, there are five patients on my unit (we have eighteen beds). We're getting one more in the next couple of hours, and then we'll have six. *twiddles thumbs*
I'd add something, but really, she says it all.
In other news, there are five patients on my unit (we have eighteen beds). We're getting one more in the next couple of hours, and then we'll have six. *twiddles thumbs*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-31 11:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-31 11:37 pm (UTC)The problem is, women have to be educated enough to know what the options are and how quickly those choices can be taken away in the hospital setting we have now. Then they might get mad enough to make some changes. The thing is, how do we do it?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-01 12:19 am (UTC)Birth can be *very* dangerous. My mum delivered my sister and suddenly suffered a great blood loss that made her lose consciousness and could've killed her. I wonder what would've happened if she had decided to get the kid at home and not have doctors around her who would help by eventual complications. Thanks God she didn't think like that, or else I probably wouldn't have a mother now.
I'm not saying that hospital births are 100% safe, but to claim that home births are safer is delusional. In case of complications, it's way better to have someone who has studied medicine with the necessary instruments nearby than to calm yourself that birth is natural and not dangerous at all. I'd never go and risk my life and the life of my kid like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-01 03:56 am (UTC)Except that studies published in respected publications like the BMJ and organizations like the WHO don't agree. This study, also from the BMJ, says that there is no difference in outcome. In fact, the vast majority of statistics say home birth outcomes are at least as good as hospital outcomes.
Postpartum uterine hemorrhage is rare, but yes, it definitely happens. Midwives, though, don't come to births untrained or empty handed, and hemorrhage is one of the possibilities they're prepared for, both by training and equipment. And life-threatening events happen in hospitals, too, sometimes caused by the hospitals themselves.
I'm definitely not saying that every woman should give birth at home. I would love to see hospital birth as a safe, healthy option for low-risk women who don't want a home birth. Unfortunately, the doctors and hospitals have most of the power, and they want to keep it that way, so it's hard for women to know who or even what to ask when it comes to childbirth choices.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-01 05:19 am (UTC)I suppose you toss around the 'q' word with impugnity as well :P
Me, from a unit that is housing just the right amount of patients for the staff, tyvm!
:smish:
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-01 05:52 am (UTC)We're up to 7 now. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-02 12:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-02 05:44 am (UTC)I saw a comment to a someone's post once that basically said that we should apply the same rules to sex as we do to childbirth because people have died of heart attacks during sex, and then there's the prospect of disease, so sex should always be done under medical supervision in a clinical setting (I assume there would be an IV lock in each arm just in case, and the couple would need to be strictly NPO in case of emergency, and of course the consent forms).