High-Tech Births
Dec. 8th, 2003 08:25 amFrom Reuters:
Defense Software Could Make Births Safer -Report
(2003-12-03)
LONDON (Reuters) - British scientists have incorporated defense software used to pick up targets on military radar into a new painless technique that detects problems during labor and could lead to safer births.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) trace developed by the defense research company QinetiQ can record an electrical signal from the heart and indicates if the baby is not getting enough oxygen or has an irregular heartbeat, a science magazine reported.
It can also detect the strength of the mother's contractions, which shows how the labor is progressing.
"The non-invasive system records signals from 12 electrodes on the mother's abdomen, separating out useful components from background noise from muscles other than the heart or interference from electrical equipment," New Scientist magazine said on Wednesday.
Doctors at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital in southwestern England who are testing the device believe it will help to detect early problems during the delivery and help to rule out unnecessary Caesarean deliveries.
A technique called cardiotocography (CTG) is already used during labor but it is not as accurate as the ECG.
"The researchers also found they could measure the mother's contractions directly, using the electrical signals from the muscles," the magazine added.
© Copyright 2003, Reuters
Um. I think this could be useful in very, very high risk birth situations. In normal, low risk situations, however, it's just another way of making chilbirth into an illness, of stealing power from women AGAIN. How much do you want to bet that millions of women will insist on it without question?
Defense Software Could Make Births Safer -Report
(2003-12-03)
LONDON (Reuters) - British scientists have incorporated defense software used to pick up targets on military radar into a new painless technique that detects problems during labor and could lead to safer births.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) trace developed by the defense research company QinetiQ can record an electrical signal from the heart and indicates if the baby is not getting enough oxygen or has an irregular heartbeat, a science magazine reported.
It can also detect the strength of the mother's contractions, which shows how the labor is progressing.
"The non-invasive system records signals from 12 electrodes on the mother's abdomen, separating out useful components from background noise from muscles other than the heart or interference from electrical equipment," New Scientist magazine said on Wednesday.
Doctors at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital in southwestern England who are testing the device believe it will help to detect early problems during the delivery and help to rule out unnecessary Caesarean deliveries.
A technique called cardiotocography (CTG) is already used during labor but it is not as accurate as the ECG.
"The researchers also found they could measure the mother's contractions directly, using the electrical signals from the muscles," the magazine added.
© Copyright 2003, Reuters
Um. I think this could be useful in very, very high risk birth situations. In normal, low risk situations, however, it's just another way of making chilbirth into an illness, of stealing power from women AGAIN. How much do you want to bet that millions of women will insist on it without question?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 06:55 am (UTC)now, i have to say, my child survived due to western medicine - he is perfectly fine and growing strong. but even in my extreme case, i was angered by the way i was treated (not spoken to - never quite in the know until the end). it was as if i had lost all control and just had to release myself into their arms. i understand to a degree, but if i ever were to have another - risk or not - i would vote birth center all the way. it's there that you are treated like a whole person - and validated for each pain and emotion. the midwife at my head during my labor was the only thing that kept me pushing as hard as i did - i didn't even look at the doctor until it was over.
okay, i'm done ranting. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 07:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 07:24 am (UTC)i swear, if more would-be mothers were educated to the benefits of birth centers, hospitals would need to do advertising to bring any pregnant woman back into their neo-natal halls. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 07:36 am (UTC)In fact, read just about everything this woman's ever written. I heard her speak once, and she's just brilliant. She knows exactly what she's talking about. *points to patchfire's icon*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 07:05 am (UTC)But... yeah. If I'd been told there was some sort of complication and I was going to need any of the gadgets- *shrugs* I wouldn't have questioned it. But it's when you're expected to not question things before there's complications that it gets to me...
~Jess
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 07:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 07:19 am (UTC)Have you read Misconceptions by Naomi Wolf? I'm not a huge fan of hers but the first bit about the hospital/birthing centre situation was really eye-opening. Out here (Australia) we're into the gadgets, but not AS into them as the US, it seems. (But then again, we have mostly public hospitals and a government not exactly spending heaps on the health system- so maybe we can't afford said gagetry? *rolls eyes*)
Oh... and is that your kidlet in your icon? He's a little spunk! :D
~Jess
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 08:21 am (UTC)and, yes, that's my little sprite. tell me about your little bumpkin. :)
we're spamming
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 07:23 am (UTC)I'd love to read your story.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 08:30 am (UTC)*whistles innocently*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 08:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 08:38 am (UTC)good luck tonight - congrats on your two days off. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 09:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 10:50 am (UTC)love your icon as well. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 11:34 am (UTC)(thanks, anyway - teehee!)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-08 11:56 am (UTC)am i being evil?good luck on your exams!