(no subject)
Jan. 14th, 2006 07:29 pmA while ago,
patchfire linked me to this post on the Mothering Dot Commune forums.
The outcome of the situation is here on post #159. How sad and pointless this decision was.
This incident is just--oh, I don't know. Not right, on so very many levels, one important one being that the accuracy of this Gender Mentor Monitor is very much in question, and in a lot of ways sounds like so much snake oil.
It's really got me thinking about the politics and bioethics of sex-selection abortions, partly because the mother chose to abort because he was a boy, rather than a girl, which is more common and is often perceived as a feminist issue.
Caveat: This post is NOT a statement about Roe v. Wade, or circumcision as a practice at all. It's about a very specific incident, and the ethics thereof. After all, just because someone has a legal right to do a thing doesn't make it ethical to do it.
patchfire has also posted about this. You can read it here.
The outcome of the situation is here on post #159. How sad and pointless this decision was.
This incident is just--oh, I don't know. Not right, on so very many levels, one important one being that the accuracy of this Gender Mentor Monitor is very much in question, and in a lot of ways sounds like so much snake oil.
It's really got me thinking about the politics and bioethics of sex-selection abortions, partly because the mother chose to abort because he was a boy, rather than a girl, which is more common and is often perceived as a feminist issue.
Caveat: This post is NOT a statement about Roe v. Wade, or circumcision as a practice at all. It's about a very specific incident, and the ethics thereof. After all, just because someone has a legal right to do a thing doesn't make it ethical to do it.
I'm scared because it has broader implications...
Date: 2006-01-16 01:38 am (UTC)While it's not my place to judge, I feel that terminating an "imperfect" pregnancy is just... well, it doesn't gel with my personal ethics. (That said, I realise for a lot of people, it's not a decision that's made lightly- like this.) One day it might be a boy they don't want, next minute it might be a fetus that might turn into someone who's gay... or who has Asperger syndrome... what next?
The idea of abortion as a way to work eugenics sickens me.
And... I can't help but think- if people want a pregnancy on their terms- ie, it has to be a boy, or be super-intelligent, or what-have-you... doesn't that make parental love conditional? And what happens when things don't turn out as predicted?
Re: I'm scared because it has broader implications...
Date: 2006-01-17 11:50 pm (UTC)When the gene for homosexuality is found (and I think it might be), there will be abortions like this, I know there will. How sad.
Eugenics is evil, I don't care what's bloody politically correct. Personally, I refused all the testing for fetal abnormalities out of preference and protest. Who's to say who's better than anyone else? :/