primroseburrows: (typing)
Dear Mr. President,

I know you're trying to give us a decent health care system. I know you're doing it in a hostile environment run by big insurance. But I still don't think your idea goes far enough.

Why aren't you supporting H.R. 676?

*sigh* You don't have to answer; I know why (see second sentence). But really. Nothing's going to work right as long as insurance companies are in the mix. And a program that would force people to have insurance like we do on cars? Wrong way, Mr. President. Because it that's the case, there will still be plenty of poor people who won't be able to afford your 'public health option', no matter how 'affordable' it may be, and they'll keep on doing without until they get caught, just like the poor people who can't afford car insurance already do.


I realize I have no idea of how hard it must be for you to push for decent health care for everyone, so I'm gonna pass the talking stick over to this guy, who absolutely does:



Mr. President, your health care plan is better than what we have now. But it's not enough.

Listen to Al. I'm just sayin'.


Sincerely, your supporter,

Me
primroseburrows: (DC)
An idea whose time has long past come:

H.R. 676: The United States National Health Insurance Act ('Expanded & Improved Medicare For All' Bill)

The US is the ONLY developed nation in the world without a national health care system. Why is this? Silly question. The insurance companies don't want their incomes to shrink, and I honestly think that the head honchos don't give a rat's ass whether Americans get medical care. National health systems aren't perfect, but every one I've read about is light-years past the US system. The insurance companies need to get out of Dodge liek, twenty years ago.

The knee-jerk response to single-payer national medicare is OMG SOCIALISM! Well, hmm. Federally, we already have the U.S. Postal service, national highway system, National Parks system, and Social Security, to name a few. Police departments, fire departments, libraries, schools, public transportation are mostly run by the states. Imagine that, all those government-run institutions and we're still not a socialist country. And anyway, single-payer system isn't socialized medicine. They're two different things.

And then there are the statistical data, and when we look at them, things aren't looking so good.

NY Times editorial on healthcare in the United States vs. other countries )

So yeah, go Google the stats and see for yourself.

And dudes. STOP USING CANADA AS THE GENERIC DEFINITION OF A SINGLE-PAYER SYSTEM.

Contrary to popular belief I don't spy for them live there, but from what I've read and heard from people who DO it's a decent system (a side-by-side comparison with the US puts them ahead on a bunch of issues) with good points and bad like everyone else, but Canada is NOT the only first world country with a national health system. It's the inverse: We're the only country without one. So stop picking on Canada, it's not neighbourly. MisterRogers would surely disapprove.


I'll be writing my Representative regarding H.R. 676. I don't need to ask for his support for the bill, he's already given it. I do want to thank him, though. The more I learn about Patrick Kennedy, the more I like him. I'll be sure to tell him that in the letter. :) And those of you guys who live in the U.S. and think the bill is a good idea, please, please, write your own Representative and ask her/him to support it. Oh, and sign the Petition.

Profile

primroseburrows: (Default)
primroseburrows

June 2018

S M T W T F S
     12
3456 789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags